rs151095402

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_080911.3(UNG):​c.262C>T​(p.Arg88Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00126 in 1,613,316 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00098 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

UNG
NM_080911.3 missense

Scores

13
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:8B:1O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
UNG (HGNC:12572): (uracil DNA glycosylase) This gene encodes one of several uracil-DNA glycosylases. One important function of uracil-DNA glycosylases is to prevent mutagenesis by eliminating uracil from DNA molecules by cleaving the N-glycosylic bond and initiating the base-excision repair (BER) pathway. Uracil bases occur from cytosine deamination or misincorporation of dUMP residues. Alternative promoter usage and splicing of this gene leads to two different isoforms: the mitochondrial UNG1 and the nuclear UNG2. The UNG2 term was used as a previous symbol for the CCNO gene (GeneID 10309), which has been confused with this gene, in the literature and some databases. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.082110554).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000978 (149/152352) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00176 (27/15308). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00124. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 73 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 149 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
UNGNM_080911.3 linkc.262C>T p.Arg88Cys missense_variant Exon 2 of 7 ENST00000242576.7 NP_550433.1 P13051-1E5KTA5
UNGNM_003362.4 linkc.235C>T p.Arg79Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 6 NP_003353.1 P13051-2E5KTA6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
UNGENST00000242576.7 linkc.262C>T p.Arg88Cys missense_variant Exon 2 of 7 1 NM_080911.3 ENSP00000242576.3 P13051-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000972
AC:
148
AN:
152234
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000386
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00119
AC:
292
AN:
244470
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
171
AN XY:
133236
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00136
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000304
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00134
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00168
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00218
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00129
AC:
1887
AN:
1460964
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00137
AC XY:
992
AN XY:
726722
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000329
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00123
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000153
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000190
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00139
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000978
AC:
149
AN:
152352
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000980
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00170
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00115
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000809
AC:
3
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00163
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
0.00113
AC:
137
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00174
EpiControl
AF:
0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:8Benign:1Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hyper-IgM syndrome type 5 Uncertain:4Benign:1Other:1
Oct 16, 2019
Revvity Omics, Revvity
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 88 of the UNG protein (p.Arg88Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs151095402, gnomAD 0.2%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with colorectal cancer (PMID: 29546359). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 440391). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on UNG function (PMID: 22521144). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Sep 21, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

-
GenomeConnect - Invitae Patient Insights Network
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Uncertain significance and reported on 10-23-2020 by Lab Invitae. GenomeConnect-Invitae Patient Insights Network assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. Registry team members make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. Phenotypic details are available under supporting information. -

Jan 06, 2020
Al Jalila Children’s Genomics Center, Al Jalila Childrens Speciality Hospital
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Pathogenic:1Uncertain:4
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 24, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Likely pathogenic
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Published functional studies suggest that although R88C does not impact UNG protein expression, this variant disrupts interaction, binding, and colocalization with RPA2 (PMID: 22521144, 24910198); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22521144, 24910198, 17029639, 36835215, 29546359, 23742752, 26935981, Conti2024[Preprint], 38746347, 39268404) -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2016
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.24
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.061
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
CADD
Pathogenic
32
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.35
T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.47
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.46
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.89
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.19
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.082
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.094
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.55
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.11
T;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.69
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.065
T
GERP RS
4.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Varity_R
0.62
gMVP
0.52

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151095402; hg19: chr12-109536366; API