Menu
GeneBe

rs151174152

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):ā€‹c.8867A>Cā€‹(p.Glu2956Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000161 in 1,613,700 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E2956Q) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

5
11

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.93
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.25593483).
BP6
Variant 13-32379429-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32379429-A-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 38189.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=8}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.8867A>C p.Glu2956Ala missense_variant 22/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.8867A>C p.Glu2956Ala missense_variant 22/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00000798
AC:
2
AN:
250630
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00000738
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
135462
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000164
AC:
24
AN:
1461480
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000110
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
727030
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000189
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000843
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 01, 2022The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000011 (3/282024 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. In a large-scale breast cancer association study, the variant was observed in individuals with breast cancer as well as in an unaffected study control individual (PMID: 33471991 (2021), see also LOVD (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/genes/BRCA2)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded conflicting predictions that this variant is deleterious or benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 28, 2021The BRCA2 c.8867A>C; p.Glu2956Ala variant (rs151174152), to our knowledge, is not reported in individuals in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 38189). This variant is found on only three chromosomes (3/282024 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The glutamate at codon 2956 is highly conserved, but computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.215). Given the lack of clinical and functional data, the significance of the p.Glu2956Ala variant is uncertain at this time. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 14, 2021Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek 2016); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Also known as 9095A>C; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12228710, 29179779, 28508593) -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthNov 30, 2023This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with alanine at codon 2956 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 2/60466 cases and 1/53461 controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=1.768, 95%CI 0.16 to 19.50; p-value=1) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_007504). This variant has been identified in 3/282024 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)May 01, 2012- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 17, 2015- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 18, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 07, 2022This missense variant replaces glutamic acid with alanine at codon 2956 of the BRCA2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. In a large breast cancer case-control study conducted by the BRIDGES consortium, this variant was reported in 2/60466 cases and 1/53461 controls, showing inconclusive association with disease (OR=1.768, 95%CI 0.16 to 19.50; p-value=1) (PMID: 33471991; Leiden Open Variation Database DB-ID BRCA2_007504). This variant has been identified in 3/282024 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 16, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingInstitute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.Dec 17, 2021- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 24, 2018Variant summary: BRCA2 c.8867A>C (p.Glu2956Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.2e-06 in 276410 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.8867A>C in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
BRCA2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 28, 2022The BRCA2 c.8867A>C variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu2956Ala. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.0040% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/13-32953566-A-C), and in the ClinVar database with conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/38189/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.10
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.036
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.19
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.96
Eigen
Benign
0.16
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.020
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.13
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.26
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.47
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.040
D;D
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.14
ClinPred
0.88
D
GERP RS
3.2
gMVP
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151174152; hg19: chr13-32953566; API