rs151180981
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 2P and 10B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_007254.4(PNKP):c.672C>T(p.Arg224=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000186 in 1,613,900 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00016 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
PNKP
NM_007254.4 synonymous
NM_007254.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.62
Genes affected
PNKP (HGNC:9154): (polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase) This locus represents a gene involved in DNA repair. In response to ionizing radiation or oxidative damage, the protein encoded by this locus catalyzes 5' phosphorylation and 3' dephosphorylation of nucleic acids. Mutations at this locus have been associated with microcephaly, seizures, and developmental delay.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 19-49864036-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-49864036-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138711.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr19-49864036-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.62 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.00016 (234/1461598) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00284 (95/33480). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00238. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNKP | NM_007254.4 | c.672C>T | p.Arg224= | synonymous_variant | 7/17 | ENST00000322344.8 | NP_009185.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PNKP | ENST00000322344.8 | c.672C>T | p.Arg224= | synonymous_variant | 7/17 | 1 | NM_007254.4 | ENSP00000323511 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000427 AC: 65AN: 152184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
65
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000140 AC: 35AN: 250786Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 16AN XY: 135650
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
250786
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135650
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000160 AC: 234AN: 1461598Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000171 AC XY: 124AN XY: 727114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
234
AN:
1461598
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
124
AN XY:
727114
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000433 AC: 66AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000416 AC XY: 31AN XY: 74464
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
66
AN:
152302
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
31
AN XY:
74464
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 06, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | PNKP: BP4, BP7 - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 09, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 10, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Microcephaly, seizures, and developmental delay Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 16, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at