rs151195362

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000169.3(GLA):c.978G>A(p.Lys326Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000171 in 1,204,535 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 60 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00091 ( 0 hom., 32 hem., cov: 23)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000096 ( 0 hom. 28 hem. )

Consequence

GLA
NM_000169.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.23

Variant links:

Genes affected

GLA (HGNC:4296): (galactosidase alpha) This gene encodes a homodimeric glycoprotein that hydrolyses the terminal alpha-galactosyl moieties from glycolipids and glycoproteins. This enzyme predominantly hydrolyzes ceramide trihexoside, and it can catalyze the hydrolysis of melibiose into galactose and glucose. A variety of mutations in this gene affect the synthesis, processing, and stability of this enzyme, which causes Fabry disease, a rare lysosomal storage disorder that results from a failure to catabolize alpha-D-galactosyl glycolipid moieties. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

GLA links:

RPL36A-HNRNPH2 (HGNC:48349): (RPL36A-HNRNPH2 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring ribosomal protein L36a and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2 (H') genes on chromosome X. The read-through transcript produces a protein with similarity to the protein encoded by the upstream locus, ribosomal protein L36a. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

RPL36A-HNRNPH2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.43).

BP6

Variant X-101398391-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-101398391-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 42466.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-101398391-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-101398391-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.23 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000905 (101/111571) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00316 (97/30744). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00265. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 32 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 32 Mitochondrial gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GLA	NM_000169.3 link	c.978G>A	p.Lys326Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	ENST00000218516.4	NP_000160.1	P06280Q53Y83

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
GLA	ENST00000218516.4 link	c.978G>A	p.Lys326Lys	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	1	NM_000169.3	ENSP00000218516.4		P06280
RPL36A-HNRNPH2	ENST00000409170.3 link	c.300+2934C>T		intron_variant	Intron 4 of 4	4		ENSP00000386655.4		H7BZ11

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000897

AC:

100

AN:

111518

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000920

AC XY:

AN XY:

33692

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00313

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000287

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000671

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000267

AC:

AN:

183470

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000280

AC XY:

AN XY:

67908

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00304

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000292

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000221

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000961

AC:

105

AN:

1092964

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000781

AC XY:

AN XY:

358726

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00247

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000568

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000370

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000370

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000905

AC:

101

AN:

111571

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000948

AC XY:

AN XY:

33755

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000286

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000662

Alfa

AF:

0.000641

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00120

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:14

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Mar 11, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 18, 2015

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Lys326Lys in exon 6 of GLA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.3% (24/8490) of Afri can chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinst itute.org; rs151195362). -

Apr 22, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:5

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

GLA: BP4, BS2 -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Fabry disease

Benign:3

Dec 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jan 05, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.43

CADD

Benign

6.9

DANN

Benign

0.79

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over