rs151204566

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001128178.3(NPHP1):​c.1270-4C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00258 in 1,608,944 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP1
NM_001128178.3 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.0008444
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.472
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP1 (HGNC:7905): (nephrocystin 1) This gene encodes a protein with src homology domain 3 (SH3) patterns. This protein interacts with Crk-associated substrate, and it appears to function in the control of cell division, as well as in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion signaling, likely as part of a multifunctional complex localized in actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene cause familial juvenile nephronophthisis type 1, a kidney disorder involving both tubules and glomeruli. Defects in this gene are also associated with Senior-Loken syndrome type 1, also referred to as juvenile nephronophthisis with Leber amaurosis, which is characterized by kidney and eye disease, and with Joubert syndrome type 4, which is characterized by cerebellar ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, psychomotor delay and neonatal breathing abnormalities, sometimes including retinal dystrophy and renal disease. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BP6
Variant 2-110146839-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-110146839-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 194327.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=1}. Variant chr2-110146839-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-110146839-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00181 (276/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00215 (146/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00186. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 116 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP1NM_001128178.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1270-4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000445609.7 NP_001121650.1 O15259-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP1ENST00000445609.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.1270-4C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_001128178.3 ENSP00000389879.3 O15259-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00182
AC:
276
AN:
152060
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000328
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0314
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000945
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00249
AC:
626
AN:
251262
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00253
AC XY:
344
AN XY:
135800
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0270
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00186
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00221
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00266
AC:
3882
AN:
1456766
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00271
AC XY:
1962
AN XY:
725004
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000420
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000581
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0259
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000375
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00398
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00181
AC:
276
AN:
152178
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00156
AC XY:
116
AN XY:
74388
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0314
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000945
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00215
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00433
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00189
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00289
EpiControl
AF:
0.00207

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenOct 01, 2024NPHP1: BP4, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 21, 2021- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 05, 2016- -
Nephronophthisis 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Joubert syndrome with renal defect Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Senior-Loken syndrome 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
11
DANN
Benign
0.68

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.00084
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.022
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs151204566; hg19: chr2-110904416; API