rs151274810
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.3534C>T(p.Asn1178=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000523 in 1,613,772 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00053 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous
NM_001369.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.00900
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 5-13871628-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13871628-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 227324.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr5-13871628-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.009 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | NM_001369.3 | c.3534C>T | p.Asn1178= | synonymous_variant | 23/79 | ENST00000265104.5 | NP_001360.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.3534C>T | p.Asn1178= | synonymous_variant | 23/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104 | P4 | |
ENST00000503244.2 | n.253+11073G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 4 | |||||||
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.3489C>T | p.Asn1163= | synonymous_variant | 23/79 | ENSP00000505288 | A1 | |||
ENST00000637153.1 | n.213+11113G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000434 AC: 66AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
66
AN:
152182
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000410 AC: 103AN: 251112Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000479 AC XY: 65AN XY: 135696
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
103
AN:
251112
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
135696
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000532 AC: 778AN: 1461472Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000539 AC XY: 392AN XY: 727028
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
778
AN:
1461472
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
392
AN XY:
727028
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000433 AC: 66AN: 152300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74482
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
66
AN:
152300
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74482
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 09, 2015 | p.Asn1178Asn in exon 23 of DNAH5: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located within the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 0.1% (60/66684) of European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac. broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs151274810). - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 20, 2017 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at