rs151315725
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001159699.2(FHL1):c.871G>A(p.Asp291Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0163 in 1,208,769 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 140 homozygotes. There are 6,223 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 9 hom., 328 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 131 hom. 5895 hem. )
Consequence
FHL1
NM_001159699.2 missense
NM_001159699.2 missense
Scores
8
4
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 6.32
Genes affected
FHL1 (HGNC:3702): (four and a half LIM domains 1) This gene encodes a member of the four-and-a-half-LIM-only protein family. Family members contain two highly conserved, tandemly arranged, zinc finger domains with four highly conserved cysteines binding a zinc atom in each zinc finger. Expression of these family members occurs in a cell- and tissue-specific mode and these proteins are involved in many cellular processes. Mutations in this gene have been found in patients with Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Multiple alternately spliced transcript variants which encode different protein isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0082143545).
BP6
Variant X-136210005-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-136210005-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 239013.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-136210005-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chrX-136210005-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0115 (1272/110547) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0194 (1026/52838). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0184. There are 9 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 328 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 9 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHL1 | NM_001159699.2 | c.871G>A | p.Asp291Asn | missense_variant | 6/6 | ENST00000370683.6 | NP_001153171.1 | |
FHL1 | NM_001159702.3 | c.*51G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000394155.8 | NP_001153174.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHL1 | ENST00000370683.6 | c.871G>A | p.Asp291Asn | missense_variant | 6/6 | 1 | NM_001159699.2 | ENSP00000359717.1 | ||
FHL1 | ENST00000394155.8 | c.*51G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | 5 | NM_001159702.3 | ENSP00000377710.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0115 AC: 1274AN: 110492Hom.: 9 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 329AN XY: 32716
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1274
AN:
110492
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
329
AN XY:
32716
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0109 AC: 1994AN: 183528Hom.: 17 AF XY: 0.0113 AC XY: 765AN XY: 67958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1994
AN:
183528
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
765
AN XY:
67958
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0167 AC: 18390AN: 1098222Hom.: 131 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0162 AC XY: 5895AN XY: 363582
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
18390
AN:
1098222
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
5895
AN XY:
363582
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0115 AC: 1272AN: 110547Hom.: 9 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0100 AC XY: 328AN XY: 32781
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1272
AN:
110547
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
328
AN XY:
32781
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
79
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
67
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
13
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
125
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1364
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 04, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Apr 29, 2021 | Variant summary: FHL1 c.*51G>A is located in the untranslated mRNA region downstream of the termination codon. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.011 in 183528 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 28 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in FHL1 causing Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy phenotype (0.00039), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.*51G>A in individuals affected with Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 24, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
X-linked myopathy with postural muscle atrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 19, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 03, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
.;.;.;.;.;D;D;D;.
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Vest4
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at