rs151321743

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2

The ENST00000290378.6(ACTC1):c.1053G>C(p.Leu351=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000125 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L351L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

ACTC1
ENST00000290378.6 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.01

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACTC1 (HGNC:143): (actin alpha cardiac muscle 1) Actins are highly conserved proteins that are involved in various types of cell motility. Polymerization of globular actin (G-actin) leads to a structural filament (F-actin) in the form of a two-stranded helix. Each actin can bind to four others. The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the actin family which is comprised of three main groups of actin isoforms, alpha, beta, and gamma. The alpha actins are found in muscle tissues and are a major constituent of the contractile apparatus. Defects in this gene have been associated with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACTC1 links:

GJD2-DT (HGNC:55560): (GJD2 divergent transcript)

GJD2-DT links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.34).

BP6

Variant 15-34790493-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-34790493-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 315702.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=5}. Variant chr15-34790493-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.01 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0000394 (6/152258) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00116 (6/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000503. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 6 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACTC1	NM_005159.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.1053G>C	p.Leu351=	synonymous_variant	7/7	ENST00000290378.6	NP_005150.1
GJD2-DT	NR_120329.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.299+13062C>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ACTC1	ENST00000290378.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.1053G>C	p.Leu351=	synonymous_variant	7/7	1	NM_005159.5	ENSP00000290378	P1
GJD2-DT	ENST00000671663.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.95-20003C>G		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152140

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000398

AC:

AN:

251478

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000294

AC XY:

AN XY:

135916

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000489

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000133

AC:

195

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000120

AC XY:

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00479

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152258

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74442

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00116

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1R

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 11

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Oct 18, 2018

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 11;C2748552:Atrial septal defect 5;C3150681:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1R

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 03, 2024

- -

not provided

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 16, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Feb 05, 2024

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jun 20, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

9.7

DANN

Benign

0.82

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over