rs1532268

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_002454.3(MTRR):​c.524C>T​(p.Ser175Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.348 in 1,613,402 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 100,433 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.32 ( 7888 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.35 ( 92545 hom. )

Consequence

MTRR
NM_002454.3 missense

Scores

17

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.35
Variant links:
Genes affected
MTRR (HGNC:7473): (5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase reductase) This gene encodes a member of the ferredoxin-NADP(+) reductase (FNR) family of electron transferases. This protein functions in the synthesis of methionine by regenerating methionine synthase to a functional state. Because methionine synthesis requires methyl-group transfer by a folate donor, activity of the encoded enzyme is important for folate metabolism and cellular methylation. Mutations in this gene can cause homocystinuria-megaloblastic anemia, cbl E type. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0014089942).
BP6
Variant 5-7878066-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-7878066-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 138304.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-7878066-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.362 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MTRRNM_002454.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.524C>T p.Ser175Leu missense_variant 5/15 ENST00000440940.7 NP_002445.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MTRRENST00000440940.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.524C>T p.Ser175Leu missense_variant 5/151 NM_002454.3 ENSP00000402510 P1Q9UBK8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.316
AC:
47805
AN:
151460
Hom.:
7871
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.265
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.364
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.241
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.369
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.376
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.328
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.452
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.366
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.315
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.311
AC:
78080
AN:
251244
Hom.:
13129
AF XY:
0.320
AC XY:
43445
AN XY:
135790
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.263
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.167
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.366
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.317
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.364
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.345
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.351
AC:
512993
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
92545
Cov.:
61
AF XY:
0.353
AC XY:
256369
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.363
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.123
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.364
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.323
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.369
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.348
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.316
AC:
47854
AN:
151578
Hom.:
7888
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.313
AC XY:
23148
AN XY:
74012
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.240
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.369
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.377
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.328
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.366
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.317
Alfa
AF:
0.354
Hom.:
20598
Bravo
AF:
0.304
TwinsUK
AF:
0.373
AC:
1384
ALSPAC
AF:
0.365
AC:
1407
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.266
AC:
1172
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.360
AC:
3097
ExAC
AF:
0.315
AC:
38271
Asia WGS
AF:
0.293
AC:
1017
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.366
EpiControl
AF:
0.369

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Methylcobalamin deficiency type cblE Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPars Genome LabJun 19, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 05, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Sep 16, 2020- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxAug 26, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedcase-controlDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna-- -
Disorders of Intracellular Cobalamin Metabolism Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.72
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
0.0060
DANN
Benign
0.69
Eigen
Benign
-2.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.033
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.23
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0014
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.91
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.2
N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.23
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.66
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.022
Sift
Benign
0.33
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.40
T;T
Vest4
0.026
MPC
0.043
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
-11
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.017
gMVP
0.24

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1532268; hg19: chr5-7878179; COSMIC: COSV52941765; COSMIC: COSV52941765; API