rs1553248267

chr1-209796467-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PM1 PM2 PM5 PP2 PP3_Strong

The NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.260T>C(p.Leu87Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L87F) has been classified as Pathogenic.

• Frequency: Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
• Consequence: IRF6 NM_006147.4 missense
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 8.73

Genes affected

IRF6 (HGNC:6121): (interferon regulatory factor 6) This gene encodes a member of the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF) family. Family members share a highly-conserved N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain and a less conserved C-terminal protein-binding domain. The encoded protein may be a transcriptional activator. Mutations in this gene can cause van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also associated with non-syndromic orofacial cleft type 6. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 11 ACMG points.

• PM1: In a hotspot region, there are 5 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 0 benign, 7 uncertain in NM_006147.4
• PM2: Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage
• PM5: Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr1-209796468-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Pathogenic]. Clinvar id is 2925312.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
• PP2: Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, IRF6
• PP3: MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.976

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
IRF6	NM_006147.4	c.260T>C	p.Leu87Pro	missense_variant	4/9	ENST00000367021.8
IRF6	NM_001206696.2	c.-26T>C		5_prime_UTR_variant	2/7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
IRF6	ENST00000367021.8	c.260T>C	p.Leu87Pro	missense_variant	4/9	1	NM_006147.4	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Van der Woude syndrome;C0265259:Popliteal pterygium syndrome;C1837213:Orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Dec 10, 2017

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. A different missense substitutions at this codon (p.Leu87Phe) has been reported in individuals affected with Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) (PMID: 19282774). This suggests that the leucine residue may be critical for IRF6 protein function Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with IRF6-related disease. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces leucine with proline at codon 87 of the IRF6 protein (p.Leu87Pro). The leucine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between leucine and proline. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Pathogenic	1.0
BayesDel_addAF	Pathogenic	0.58	D
BayesDel_noAF	Pathogenic	0.60
Cadd	Pathogenic	32
Dann	Pathogenic	1.0
DEOGEN2	Pathogenic	0.99	D;D
Eigen	Pathogenic	0.93
Eigen_PC	Pathogenic	0.87
FATHMM_MKL	Pathogenic	0.98	D
LIST_S2	Uncertain	0.97	D;D
M_CAP	Pathogenic	0.97	D
MetaRNN	Pathogenic	0.98	D;D
MetaSVM	Pathogenic	1.1	D
MutationAssessor	Pathogenic	4.0	H;.
MutationTaster	Benign	1.0	D;D
PrimateAI	Pathogenic	0.90	D
PROVEAN	Pathogenic	-6.3	D;D
REVEL	Pathogenic	0.98
Sift	Pathogenic	0.0	D;D
Sift4G	Pathogenic	0.0	D;.
Polyphen		1.0	D;.
Vest4		0.98
MutPred		0.81		Loss of stability (P = 0.0054);Loss of stability (P = 0.0054);
MVP		1.0
MPC		3.0
ClinPred		1.0	D
GERP RS		5.6
Varity_R		0.99
gMVP		0.98

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1553248267; hg19: chr1-209969812;