rs1553312826
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_003597.5(KLF11):c.23G>A(p.Gly8Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000567 in 1,233,506 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003597.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLF11 | NM_003597.5 | c.23G>A | p.Gly8Asp | missense_variant | 1/4 | ENST00000305883.6 | NP_003588.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLF11 | ENST00000305883.6 | c.23G>A | p.Gly8Asp | missense_variant | 1/4 | 1 | NM_003597.5 | ENSP00000307023.1 | ||
KLF11 | ENST00000401510.5 | c.-10+668G>A | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000386058.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 149224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 FAILED QC
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000312 AC: 3AN: 96258Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000558 AC XY: 3AN XY: 53774
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000567 AC: 7AN: 1233506Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00000657 AC XY: 4AN XY: 608878
GnomAD4 genome Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0 AF: 0.00 AC: 0AN: 149224Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 72712
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hyperglycemia;C0342276:Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Centre for Mendelian Genomics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Jan 01, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at