rs1553369194
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PM4PP3
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2182_2199delGAAATGTTGGAAACTGCT(p.Glu728_Ala733del) variant causes a conservative inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
MSH2
NM_000251.3 conservative_inframe_deletion
NM_000251.3 conservative_inframe_deletion
Scores
Not classified
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.60
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 7 ACMG points.
PM1
In a helix (size 14) in uniprot entity MSH2_HUMAN there are 4 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_000251.3
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PM4
Nonframeshift variant in NON repetitive region in NM_000251.3.
PP3
No computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, but strongly conserved according to phyloP
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | c.2182_2199delGAAATGTTGGAAACTGCT | p.Glu728_Ala733del | conservative_inframe_deletion | 13/16 | ENST00000233146.7 | NP_000242.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | c.2182_2199delGAAATGTTGGAAACTGCT | p.Glu728_Ala733del | conservative_inframe_deletion | 13/16 | 1 | NM_000251.3 | ENSP00000233146.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Glu728_Ala733del variant was identified in 1 of 102 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from individuals or families with Lynch Syndrome tumours and predicted to have an effect on protein function (Barrow 2010). The variant was not identified in dbSNP NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), Exome Aggregation Consortium (released January 13, 2015), COSMIC, MutDB, Mismatch Repair Genes Variant, MMR Gene Unclassified Variants , InSiGHT Colon Cancer Database, Zhejiang Colon Cancer, the ClinVar, Clinvitae, GeneInsight through the Canadian Open Genetics Repository (http://opengenetics.ca/) and UMD databases. This variant is an in-frame deletion resulting in the removal of 5 amino acids from Glu residue at codon 728 to Ala residue at codon 733. The presence of a Lynch syndrome related cancer in this individual and in other family members is supportive of a pathogenic role for this variant. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more pathogenic role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted pathogenic. - |
Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Feb 09, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at