rs1553907172
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PM2PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.23305G>A(p.Val7769Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,414 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V7769V) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.23305G>A | p.Val7769Ile | missense_variant | 80/363 | ENST00000589042.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.23305G>A | p.Val7769Ile | missense_variant | 80/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.503-14047C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461414Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 726980
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 03, 2018 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Revvity Omics, Revvity | Jul 08, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at