rs1554071538
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 4P and 1B. PM1PM2BP4
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.466G>A(p.Asp156Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 29
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1
This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces aspartic acid with asparagine at codon 156 of the APC protein (p.Asp156Asn). The aspartic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between aspartic acid and asparagine. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with APC-related conditions. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.D156N variant (also known as c.466G>A), located in coding exon 4 of the APC gene, results from a G to A substitution at nucleotide position 466. The aspartic acid at codon 156 is replaced by asparagine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This amino acid position is conserved. In addition, in silico predictors for this gene do not accurately predict pathogenicity. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at