rs1554072085
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.5785G>C(p.Asp1929His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.5785G>C | p.Asp1929His | missense_variant | Exon 35 of 79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104.4 | ||
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.5740G>C | p.Asp1914His | missense_variant | Exon 35 of 79 | ENSP00000505288.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Deleterious"; PolyPhen-2: "Possibly Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with DNAH5-related disease. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces aspartic acid with histidine at codon 1929 of the DNAH5 protein (p.Asp1929His). The aspartic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between aspartic acid and histidine. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at