rs1554084213
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_000038.6(APC):c.2494C>A(p.Pro832Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000038.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APC | ENST00000257430.9 | c.2494C>A | p.Pro832Thr | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 16 | 5 | NM_000038.6 | ENSP00000257430.4 | ||
ENSG00000258864 | ENST00000520401.1 | n.228+9116C>A | intron_variant | Intron 3 of 7 | 3 | ENSP00000454861.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
This missense variant replaces proline with threonine at codon 832 of the APC protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with hereditary cancer in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
The p.P832T variant (also known as c.2494C>A), located in coding exon 15 of the APC gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 2494. The proline at codon 832 is replaced by threonine, an amino acid with highly similar properties. This variant was not reported in population based cohorts in the following databases: Database of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (dbSNP), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), and 1000 Genomes Project. In the ESP, this variant was not observed in 6502 samples (13004 alleles) with coverage at this position. To date, this alteration has been detected with an allele frequency of approximately 0.001% (greater than 90000 alleles tested) in our clinical cohort. This amino acid position is highly conserved through reptiles, but is not conserved in lower species. In addition, in silico predictors for this gene do not accurately predict pathogenicity. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Familial adenomatous polyposis 1 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 832 of the APC protein (p.Pro832Thr). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with APC-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 486759). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt APC protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at