rs1554092890
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.2504T>A(p.Met835Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001369.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.2504T>A | p.Met835Lys | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104.4 | ||
| DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.2459T>A | p.Met820Lys | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 79 | ENSP00000505288.1 | ||||
| ENSG00000251423 | ENST00000503244.2 | n.254-5540A>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 4 | |||||
| ENSG00000251423 | ENST00000637153.1 | n.214-5540A>T | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 5 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31 
GnomAD4 genome  
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia    Pathogenic:1 
For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt DNAH5 protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454758). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of primary ciliary dyskinesia (Invitae). In at least one individual the data is consistent with being in trans (on the opposite chromosome) from a pathogenic variant. This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This sequence change replaces methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 835 of the DNAH5 protein (p.Met835Lys). -
not specified    Uncertain:1 
Variant summary: DNAH5 c.2504T>A (p.Met835Lys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251048 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.2504T>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 (Similuk_2022, LCG). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 35753512). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454758). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
DNAH5-related disorder    Uncertain:1 
The DNAH5 c.2504T>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Met835Lys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature or in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at