rs1554204122
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 22 ACMG points: 22P and 0B. PS1PM1PM2PM5PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_022455.5(NSD1):c.5758T>A(p.Cys1920Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in the same amino acid substitution has been previously reported as Pathogenic in ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. C1920R) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022455.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome due to NSD1 mutationInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
- Sotos syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen
- Sotos syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 22 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Sotos syndrome Pathogenic:2
- -
This NSD1 variant is absent from a large population dataset. A single submitter in ClinVar classifies this variant as likely pathogenic. Three bioinformatic tools queried predict that this substitution would be damaging, and the cysteine residue at this position is evolutionarily conserved across all species assessed. As this variant is apparently de novo and consistent with this patient's clinical findings, we consider it to be likely pathogenic. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at