rs1554361015
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PM1PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_000441.2(SLC26A4):c.1958T>C(p.Val653Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V653L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000441.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 4Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Pendred syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
- athyreosisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- thyroid hypoplasiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC26A4 | NM_000441.2 | c.1958T>C | p.Val653Ala | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 21 | ENST00000644269.2 | NP_000432.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLC26A4 | ENST00000644269.2 | c.1958T>C | p.Val653Ala | missense_variant | Exon 17 of 21 | NM_000441.2 | ENSP00000494017.1 | |||
| SLC26A4 | ENST00000492030.2 | n.245T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 6 | 5 | |||||
| SLC26A4 | ENST00000644846.1 | n.668T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 7 of 10 | ENSP00000494344.1 | |||||
| SLC26A4 | ENST00000480841.5 | n.*97T>C | downstream_gene_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461768Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727190 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: SLC26A4 c.1958T>C (p.Val653Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the STAS domain (IPR002645) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant was absent in 251168 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.1958T>C has been reported in the literature in the heterozygous state in individuals affected with nonsyndromic hearing loss (e.g. Scott_2000, Prasad_2004). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Pendred syndrome. Experimental studies show that this variant results in lower levels of iodide and chloride transport and co-immunoprecipitates with EphA2 (e.g. Scott_2000, Li_2020). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 32165640, 14679580, 10861298). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 556316). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Pendred syndrome Uncertain:1
This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at