rs1554654063
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_058195.4(CDKN2A):c.314C>T(p.Pro105Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000344 in 1,452,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_058195.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | NM_058195.4 | c.314C>T | p.Pro105Leu | missense_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000579755.2 | NP_478102.2 | |
CDKN2A | NM_000077.5 | c.271C>T | p.Leu91Leu | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | ENST00000304494.10 | NP_000068.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDKN2A | ENST00000579755.2 | c.314C>T | p.Pro105Leu | missense_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_058195.4 | ENSP00000462950.1 | ||
CDKN2A | ENST00000304494.10 | c.271C>T | p.Leu91Leu | synonymous_variant | 2/3 | 1 | NM_000077.5 | ENSP00000307101.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000344 AC: 5AN: 1452938Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000553 AC XY: 4AN XY: 723136
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial melanoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 16, 2021 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Feb 16, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at