rs1554700603
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PM4_SupportingPP5_Moderate
The NM_004612.4(TGFBR1):c.633_635dupTGG(p.Gly212dup) variant causes a disruptive inframe insertion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004612.4 disruptive_inframe_insertion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
 - Loeys-Dietz syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
 - Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
 - multiple self-healing squamous epitheliomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes  Cov.: 32 
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31 
GnomAD4 genome  Cov.: 32 
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection    Pathogenic:1 
The c.633_635dupTGG pathogenic mutation (also known as p.G212dup), located in coding exon 4 of the TGFBR1 gene, results from an in-frame duplication of TGG at nucleotide positions 633 to 635. This results in the duplication of an extra residue between codons 212 and 213. This alteration was confirmed as de novo in a proband tested by our laboratory whose clinical features are consistent with Loeys-Dietz syndrome. Based on the available evidence, c.633_635dupTGG is classified as a pathogenic mutation. -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at