rs1555452514
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_032444.4(SLX4):c.32G>T(p.Gly11Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G11G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_032444.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX4 | NM_032444.4 | c.32G>T | p.Gly11Val | missense_variant | 2/15 | ENST00000294008.4 | |
SLX4 | XM_024450471.2 | c.32G>T | p.Gly11Val | missense_variant | 2/15 | ||
SLX4 | XM_011522715.4 | c.32G>T | p.Gly11Val | missense_variant | 2/15 | ||
SLX4 | XR_007064923.1 | n.681G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/13 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLX4 | ENST00000294008.4 | c.32G>T | p.Gly11Val | missense_variant | 2/15 | 5 | NM_032444.4 | P1 | |
SLX4 | ENST00000466154.5 | n.327G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/7 | 1 | ||||
SLX4 | ENST00000486524.1 | n.660G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/4 | 2 | ||||
SLX4 | ENST00000697859.1 | n.654G>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 22, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at