rs1555487524
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001089.3(ABCA3):c.3311T>G(p.Leu1104Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L1104L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001089.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- interstitial lung disease due to ABCA3 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001089.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCA3 | NM_001089.3 | MANE Select | c.3311T>G | p.Leu1104Arg | missense | Exon 23 of 33 | NP_001080.2 | Q99758-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABCA3 | ENST00000301732.10 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.3311T>G | p.Leu1104Arg | missense | Exon 23 of 33 | ENSP00000301732.5 | Q99758-1 | |
| ABCA3 | ENST00000382381.7 | TSL:1 | c.3137T>G | p.Leu1046Arg | missense | Exon 22 of 32 | ENSP00000371818.3 | H0Y3H2 | |
| ABCA3 | ENST00000967440.1 | c.3311T>G | p.Leu1104Arg | missense | Exon 23 of 33 | ENSP00000637499.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at