rs1555509752

Positions:

• chr16-68738288-C-A
• chr16-68738288-C-G
• chr16-68738288-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. BP4 BS2_Supporting PM2_Supporting

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The c.49-9C>A is an intronic variant in the splice acceptor region of intron 1. This variant is absent in the gnomAD cohort (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been reported in at least three individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2_Supporting; SCV000729557.1, SCV000760811.1). This variant is predicted to have no impact on splicing by multiple in silico splice site predictors. HumanSpliceFinder predicts that this variant may alter an exonic ESE site, but this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally to our knowledge (BP4). In summary, due to the use of the Bayesian point system for this variant with conflicting evidence, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting, BS2_Supporting, BP4. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA658798616/MONDO:0007648/007

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000065 (0 hom.)
• Consequence: CDH1 NM_004360.5 intron
• Scores: Splicing: ADA: 0.001651
• Clinical Significance: Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1 B:4
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.989

Genes affected

CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

• PM2: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
• BP4: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
• BS2: For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CDH1	NM_004360.5	c.49-9C>A		intron_variant		ENST00000261769.10	NP_004351.1
CDH1	NM_001317184.2	c.49-9C>A		intron_variant			NP_001304113.1
CDH1	NM_001317185.2	c.-1567-9C>A		intron_variant			NP_001304114.1
CDH1	NM_001317186.2	c.-1771-9C>A		intron_variant			NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CDH1	ENST00000261769.10	c.49-9C>A		intron_variant		1	NM_004360.5	ENSP00000261769.4
CDH1	ENST00000422392.6	c.49-9C>A		intron_variant		1		ENSP00000414946.2
CDH1	ENST00000566612.5	n.49-9C>A		intron_variant		1		ENSP00000454782.1
CDH1	ENST00000566510.5	n.49-9C>A		intron_variant		5		ENSP00000458139.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000652 AC: 9 AN: 1379752 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000587 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 681906

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000848

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1 Benign:4

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:1 Benign:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System	-	The CDH1 c.49-9C>A variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the dbSNP database. The variant was identified in ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae and likely benign by GeneDx). The variant was not identified in the following control databases: the Exome Aggregation Consortium (August 8th 2016), or the Genome Aggregation Database (Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in an individual in our laboratory with a pathogenic POLE variant (c. c.5378+1G>A). The variant occurs at a non-highly conserved nucleotide and 2 out of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Oct 12, 2023	- -

not specified Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Feb 02, 2018

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1

Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel

curation

ClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel

Aug 18, 2023

The c.49-9C>A is an intronic variant in the splice acceptor region of intron 1. This variant is absent in the gnomAD cohort (PM2_Supporting; http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). This variant has been reported in at least three individuals without DGC, SRC tumours or LBC and whose families do not suggest HDGC (BS2_Supporting; SCV000729557.1, SCV000760811.1). This variant is predicted to have no impact on splicing by multiple in silico splice site predictors. HumanSpliceFinder predicts that this variant may alter an exonic ESE site, but this effect has not been demonstrated experimentally to our knowledge (BP4). In summary, due to the use of the Bayesian point system for this variant with conflicting evidence, this variant meets criteria to be classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP criteria applied as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel (Variant Interpretation Guidelines Version 3.1): PM2_Supporting, BS2_Supporting, BP4. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Oct 06, 2017

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.69
CADD	Benign	12
DANN	Benign	0.84

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA	Benign	0.0017
dbscSNV1_RF	Benign	0.16
SpliceAI score (max)		0.14		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1555509752; hg19: chr16-68772191;