rs1555570500
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM2BS2_Supporting
The NM_002878.4(RAD51D):c.28C>T(p.Pro10Ser) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000342 in 1,460,134 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002878.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000342 AC: 5AN: 1460134Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 726460
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
Variant summary: The RAD51D c.28C>T (p.Pro10Ser) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. Pro10 is conserved in mammals, but is not located in a known functional domain. 4/4 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was absent in 119672 control chromosomes and has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications and/or reputable databases/clinical diagnostic laboratories; nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Because of the absence of clinical information and the lack of functional studies, the variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) until additional information becomes available. -
Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21111057) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2
The p.P10S variant (also known as c.28C>T), located in coding exon 1 of the RAD51D gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 28. The proline at codon 10 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
This missense variant replaces proline with serine at codon 10 of the RAD51D protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold <= 0.5, PMID: 27666373). To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with RAD51D-related disorders in the literature. This variant has not been identified in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 4 Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 10 of the RAD51D protein (p.Pro10Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with RAD51D-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 480536). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at