rs1555913523
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3_Strong
The ENST00000404276.6(CHEK2):c.1276C>T(p.Pro426Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000688 in 1,453,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P426A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000404276.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | NM_007194.4 | c.1276C>T | p.Pro426Ser | missense_variant | 12/15 | ENST00000404276.6 | NP_009125.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHEK2 | ENST00000404276.6 | c.1276C>T | p.Pro426Ser | missense_variant | 12/15 | 1 | NM_007194.4 | ENSP00000385747 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.88e-7 AC: 1AN: 1453878Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 723862
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Aug 14, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Mar 07, 2023 | This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 01, 2023 | This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 426 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Pro426Ser). This variant is not present in population databases (gnomAD no frequency). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 21244692). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 548774). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may create or strengthen a splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 22, 2024 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in an individual with breast cancer (PMID: 21244692); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21244692, 19782031, 22419737) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 11, 2023 | The p.P426S variant (also known as c.1276C>T), located in coding exon 11 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1276. The proline at codon 426 is replaced by serine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at