rs1556473119
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points: 8P and 0B. PM2PP3_StrongPP5_Moderate
The NM_000397.4(CYBB):c.1702G>A(p.Glu568Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000397.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- granulomatous disease, chronic, X-linkedInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
- chronic granulomatous diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- X-linked Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases due to CYBB deficiencyInheritance: XL, Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 28
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Granulomatous disease, chronic, X-linked Pathogenic:1
For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change abolishes the NADPH oxidase assembly process (PMID: 10627478, 20724480). This variant has been reported in an individual affected with X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) (PMID: 10627478). This variant has also been observed to segregate in a single family in which affected members displayed symptoms consistent with CGD in (Invitae). This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). This sequence change replaces glutamic acid with lysine at codon 568 of the CYBB protein (p.Glu568Lys). The glutamic acid residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between glutamic acid and lysine. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at