rs1557091354
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_001278116.2(L1CAM):c.2042C>T(p.Pro681Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 23)
Consequence
L1CAM
NM_001278116.2 missense
NM_001278116.2 missense
Scores
9
5
1
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.69
Genes affected
L1CAM (HGNC:6470): (L1 cell adhesion molecule) The protein encoded by this gene is an axonal glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin supergene family. The ectodomain, consisting of several immunoglobulin-like domains and fibronectin-like repeats (type III), is linked via a single transmembrane sequence to a conserved cytoplasmic domain. This cell adhesion molecule plays an important role in nervous system development, including neuronal migration and differentiation. Mutations in the gene cause X-linked neurological syndromes known as CRASH (corpus callosum hypoplasia, retardation, aphasia, spastic paraplegia and hydrocephalus). Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants, some of which include an alternate exon that is considered to be specific to neurons. [provided by RefSeq, May 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
?
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.95
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1CAM | NM_001278116.2 | c.2042C>T | p.Pro681Leu | missense_variant | 17/29 | ENST00000370060.7 | |
L1CAM | NM_000425.5 | c.2042C>T | p.Pro681Leu | missense_variant | 16/28 | ||
L1CAM | NM_024003.3 | c.2042C>T | p.Pro681Leu | missense_variant | 16/27 | ||
L1CAM | NM_001143963.2 | c.2027C>T | p.Pro676Leu | missense_variant | 15/26 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1CAM | ENST00000370060.7 | c.2042C>T | p.Pro681Leu | missense_variant | 17/29 | 5 | NM_001278116.2 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 23
GnomAD3 genomes
?
Cov.:
23
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
31
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 genome
?
Cov.:
23
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Spastic paraplegia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Sep 20, 2017 | This sequence change replaces proline with leucine at codon 681 of the L1CAM protein (p.Pro681Leu). The proline residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between proline and leucine. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be disruptive, but these predictions have not been confirmed by published functional studies and their clinical significance is uncertain. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with L1CAM-related disease. This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 03, 2020 | Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; Not observed in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016) - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;.;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
.;D;.;D
Vest4
MutPred
0.84
.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0699);.;Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0699);
MVP
MPC
1.5
ClinPred
D
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at