rs1557106008
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PM2PP3PP5
The NM_001256789.3(CACNA1F):c.4439C>T(p.Pro1480Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000456 in 1,097,452 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 1 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1480P) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001256789.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1F | NM_001256789.3 | c.4439C>T | p.Pro1480Leu | missense_variant | 38/48 | ENST00000323022.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1F | ENST00000323022.10 | c.4439C>T | p.Pro1480Leu | missense_variant | 38/48 | 1 | NM_001256789.3 | ||
CACNA1F | ENST00000376265.2 | c.4472C>T | p.Pro1491Leu | missense_variant | 38/48 | 1 | P1 | ||
CACNA1F | ENST00000376251.5 | c.4277C>T | p.Pro1426Leu | missense_variant | 38/48 | 1 | |||
CACNA1F | ENST00000481035.1 | n.364C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 1/4 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000456 AC: 5AN: 1097452Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 1AN XY: 362846
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Congenital stationary night blindness Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | research | NIHR Bioresource Rare Diseases, University of Cambridge | Jan 01, 2015 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at