rs1596967242
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP3BP6_Moderate
The NM_001199107.2(TBC1D24):c.-35delG variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001199107.2 5_prime_UTR
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- DOORS syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P
- familial infantile myoclonic epilepsyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 65Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- malignant migrating partial seizures of infancyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- focal epilepsy-intellectual disability-cerebro-cerebellar malformationInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- hearing loss, autosomal recessiveInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- progressive myoclonic epilepsy with dystoniaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 86Inheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at