rs16024
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 1P and 13B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001127222.2(CACNA1A):c.3040G>A(p.Glu1014Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00525 in 1,541,592 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127222.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1A | NM_001127222.2 | c.3040G>A | p.Glu1014Lys | missense_variant | 19/47 | ENST00000360228.11 | NP_001120694.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACNA1A | ENST00000360228.11 | c.3040G>A | p.Glu1014Lys | missense_variant | 19/47 | 1 | NM_001127222.2 | ENSP00000353362 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00377 AC: 573AN: 152150Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00356 AC: 514AN: 144488Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00375 AC XY: 289AN XY: 77066
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00541 AC: 7523AN: 1389326Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00532 AC XY: 3645AN XY: 685244
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00376 AC: 573AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00357 AC XY: 266AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 08, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | CACNA1A: PP2, PP3, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 08, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jan 31, 2017 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 17, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Intellectual disability Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Episodic ataxia type 2;C4310716:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 42 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Apr 24, 2018 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
CACNA1A-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 09, 2024 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 42 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Jun 12, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at