rs16866380

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.105782C>T​(p.Pro35261Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0299 in 1,613,654 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,509 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P35261T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.042 ( 227 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.029 ( 1282 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

2
2
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.59

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0016560853).
BP6
Variant 2-178530833-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178530833-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47700.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.155 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.105782C>T p.Pro35261Leu missense_variant Exon 358 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.105782C>T p.Pro35261Leu missense_variant Exon 358 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0424
AC:
6436
AN:
151856
Hom.:
227
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0743
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00879
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0399
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0421
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.165
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0463
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0570
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0575
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0401
AC:
9981
AN:
249042
AF XY:
0.0401
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0739
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0417
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.176
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00353
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0206
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0392
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0286
AC:
41792
AN:
1461680
Hom.:
1282
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0290
AC XY:
21104
AN XY:
727124
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0753
AC:
2521
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0337
AC:
1507
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0425
AC:
1112
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.179
AC:
7097
AN:
39694
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0490
AC:
4224
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00333
AC:
178
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0966
AC:
557
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0201
AC:
22381
AN:
1111858
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0367
AC:
2215
AN:
60372
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2698
5396
8093
10791
13489
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1002
2004
3006
4008
5010
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0424
AC:
6448
AN:
151974
Hom.:
227
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0423
AC XY:
3137
AN XY:
74244
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0744
AC:
3081
AN:
41404
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0399
AC:
610
AN:
15274
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0421
AC:
146
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.164
AC:
847
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0465
AC:
224
AN:
4814
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00237
AC:
25
AN:
10538
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0612
AC:
18
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0201
AC:
1367
AN:
68000
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0578
AC:
122
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
291
583
874
1166
1457
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
82
164
246
328
410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0300
Hom.:
344
Bravo
AF:
0.0468
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0200
AC:
74
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0683
AC:
260
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0208
AC:
171
ExAC
AF:
0.0401
AC:
4848
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0950
AC:
330
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0251
EpiControl
AF:
0.0289

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
May 23, 2012
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Mar 11, 2024
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.90
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Benign
0.032
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.16
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;T;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0017
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
5.6
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-4.7
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Sift
Uncertain
0.0020
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Sift4G
Pathogenic
0.0
.;.;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.18
ClinPred
0.046
T
GERP RS
5.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.8
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16866380; hg19: chr2-179395560; COSMIC: COSV107419466; COSMIC: COSV107419466; API