rs16866406

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.59585C>T​(p.Pro19862Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.153 in 1,612,920 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22,173 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P19862S) has been classified as Benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.14 ( 2002 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.15 ( 20171 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
3
12

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.76

Publications

30 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0036236942).
BP6
Variant 2-178592420-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178592420-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 47152.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.431 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkc.59585C>T p.Pro19862Leu missense_variant Exon 301 of 363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkc.59585C>T p.Pro19862Leu missense_variant Exon 301 of 363 5 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.142
AC:
21643
AN:
151938
Hom.:
1996
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0756
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.471
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.129
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.174
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.446
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.265
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.163
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.114
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.146
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.129
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.177
AC:
43914
AN:
248040
AF XY:
0.181
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0705
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.148
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.175
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.432
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.152
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.144
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.159
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.155
AC:
225731
AN:
1460864
Hom.:
20171
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.158
AC XY:
114647
AN XY:
726692
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0716
AC:
2393
AN:
33442
American (AMR)
AF:
0.148
AC:
6592
AN:
44690
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.174
AC:
4541
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.435
AC:
17254
AN:
39636
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.256
AC:
22064
AN:
86164
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.151
AC:
8062
AN:
53376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.132
AC:
761
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.139
AC:
154197
AN:
1111354
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.164
AC:
9867
AN:
60336
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11141
22283
33424
44566
55707
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5762
11524
17286
23048
28810
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.142
AC:
21654
AN:
152056
Hom.:
2002
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.147
AC XY:
10955
AN XY:
74304
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0754
AC:
3130
AN:
41502
American (AMR)
AF:
0.129
AC:
1970
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.174
AC:
605
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.446
AC:
2289
AN:
5132
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.264
AC:
1270
AN:
4812
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.163
AC:
1729
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.122
AC:
36
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.146
AC:
9905
AN:
67962
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.138
AC:
292
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
925
1851
2776
3702
4627
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
254
508
762
1016
1270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.147
Hom.:
5858
Bravo
AF:
0.138
TwinsUK
AF:
0.134
AC:
496
ALSPAC
AF:
0.140
AC:
541
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0765
AC:
283
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.147
AC:
1205
ExAC
AF:
0.177
AC:
21337
Asia WGS
AF:
0.341
AC:
1185
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.138
EpiControl
AF:
0.141

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Nov 01, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 18, 2020
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 31, 2012
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Sep 21, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Sep 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 16, 2013
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.45
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.92
Eigen
Benign
0.055
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.22
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0036
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PhyloP100
4.8
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.71
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.6
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.17
T;T;.;.;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0080
.;.;.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.18
MPC
0.092
ClinPred
0.019
T
GERP RS
5.2
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16866406; hg19: chr2-179457147; COSMIC: COSV59894787; COSMIC: COSV59894787; API