rs16866467

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.23001G>A​(p.Thr7667=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0022 in 1,613,248 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 71 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 42 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 29 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:22

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.441
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant 2-178721018-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178721018-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46708.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178721018-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.441 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0116 (1769/152226) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0408 (1694/41552). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0392. There are 42 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 817 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 42 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.23001G>A p.Thr7667= synonymous_variant 79/363 ENST00000589042.5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.23001G>A p.Thr7667= synonymous_variant 79/3635 NM_001267550.2 P1
TTN-AS1ENST00000659121.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.503-13486C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0116
AC:
1769
AN:
152108
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0409
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00354
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00767
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00289
AC:
717
AN:
248320
Hom.:
10
AF XY:
0.00219
AC XY:
295
AN XY:
134676
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0422
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00157
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000535
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000664
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00122
AC:
1785
AN:
1461022
Hom.:
29
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00104
AC XY:
754
AN XY:
726750
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0439
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00217
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000459
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00260
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0116
AC:
1769
AN:
152226
Hom.:
42
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0110
AC XY:
817
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0408
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00354
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00759
Alfa
AF:
0.00581
Hom.:
10
Bravo
AF:
0.0136
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:22
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 30, 2019- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJun 03, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 03, 20123.4% (134/3994) of Afr Amer chrom from ESP -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMar 12, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 01, 2013- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 06, 2023- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 17, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
6.2
DANN
Benign
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16866467; hg19: chr2-179585745; COSMIC: COSV104645713; COSMIC: COSV104645713; API