rs16907720

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_004560.4(ROR2):​c.498T>C​(p.Asp166Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0619 in 1,614,098 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,888 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.086 ( 825 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.059 ( 3063 hom. )

Consequence

ROR2
NM_004560.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.89

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ROR2 (HGNC:10257): (receptor tyrosine kinase like orphan receptor 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a receptor protein tyrosine kinase and type I transmembrane protein that belongs to the ROR subfamily of cell surface receptors. The protein may be involved in the early formation of the chondrocytes and may be required for cartilage and growth plate development. Mutations in this gene can cause brachydactyly type B, a skeletal disorder characterized by hypoplasia/aplasia of distal phalanges and nails. In addition, mutations in this gene can cause the autosomal recessive form of Robinow syndrome, which is characterized by skeletal dysplasia with generalized limb bone shortening, segmental defects of the spine, brachydactyly, and a dysmorphic facial appearance. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ROR2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • brachydactyly type B1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 9-91737515-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-91737515-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 159820.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.89 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.167 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004560.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ROR2
NM_004560.4
MANE Select
c.498T>Cp.Asp166Asp
synonymous
Exon 5 of 9NP_004551.2
ROR2
NM_001318204.2
c.498T>Cp.Asp166Asp
synonymous
Exon 5 of 8NP_001305133.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
ROR2
ENST00000375708.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.498T>Cp.Asp166Asp
synonymous
Exon 5 of 9ENSP00000364860.3
ROR2
ENST00000375715.5
TSL:1
c.78T>Cp.Asp26Asp
synonymous
Exon 5 of 13ENSP00000364867.1
ROR2
ENST00000550066.5
TSL:2
n.966T>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 7 of 11

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0863
AC:
13128
AN:
152120
Hom.:
821
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.170
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0482
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0586
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0729
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0405
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0800
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0558
AC:
14026
AN:
251448
AF XY:
0.0527
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.174
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0366
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0728
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000163
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0433
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0600
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0593
AC:
86683
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
3063
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0578
AC XY:
42039
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.177
AC:
5925
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0392
AC:
1752
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0723
AC:
1890
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000756
AC:
3
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
1487
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0450
AC:
2404
AN:
53408
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0872
AC:
503
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0618
AC:
68724
AN:
1111996
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0662
AC:
3995
AN:
60392
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.477
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4685
9371
14056
18742
23427
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2550
5100
7650
10200
12750
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0864
AC:
13152
AN:
152238
Hom.:
825
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0828
AC XY:
6162
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.170
AC:
7058
AN:
41506
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0585
AC:
895
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0729
AC:
253
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0174
AC:
84
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0405
AC:
430
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0884
AC:
26
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0617
AC:
4194
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0791
AC:
167
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
586
1172
1757
2343
2929
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
134
268
402
536
670
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0738
Hom.:
823
Bravo
AF:
0.0929
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0210
AC:
73
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0671
EpiControl
AF:
0.0683

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 27, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:2
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Brachydactyly type B1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
0.13
DANN
Benign
0.51
PhyloP100
-1.9
Mutation Taster
=98/2
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16907720; hg19: chr9-94499797; API