Menu
GeneBe

rs16916632

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_019098.5(CNGB3):c.608G>A(p.Arg203Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00948 in 1,613,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,054 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R203?) has been classified as Pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.047 ( 552 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0056 ( 502 hom. )

Consequence

CNGB3
NM_019098.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.856
Variant links:
Genes affected
CNGB3 (HGNC:2153): (cyclic nucleotide gated channel subunit beta 3) This gene encodes the beta subunit of a cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel. The encoded beta subunit appears to play a role in modulation of channel function in cone photoreceptors. This heterotetrameric channel is necessary for sensory transduction, and mutations in this gene have been associated with achromatopsia 3, progressive cone dystrophy, and juvenile macular degeneration, also known as Stargardt Disease. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM5
Other missense variant is known to change same aminoacid residue: Variant chr8-86668053-TCG-TA is described in Lovd as [Pathogenic].
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0015887618).
BP6
Variant 8-86668054-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-86668054-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 261089.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-86668054-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.158 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CNGB3NM_019098.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.608G>A p.Arg203Gln missense_variant 5/18 ENST00000320005.6
CNGB3XM_011517138.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.194G>A p.Arg65Gln missense_variant 3/16

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CNGB3ENST00000320005.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.608G>A p.Arg203Gln missense_variant 5/181 NM_019098.5 P1Q9NQW8-1
CNGB3ENST00000681746.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.608G>A p.Arg203Gln missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 5/19

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0469
AC:
7121
AN:
151846
Hom.:
549
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.162
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00522
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0104
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0378
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0147
AC:
3695
AN:
251418
Hom.:
251
AF XY:
0.0115
AC XY:
1558
AN XY:
135878
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.172
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00943
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00696
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0101
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00558
AC:
8159
AN:
1461820
Hom.:
502
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00513
AC XY:
3730
AN XY:
727222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.163
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0106
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00383
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000311
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0470
AC:
7137
AN:
151962
Hom.:
552
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0443
AC XY:
3289
AN XY:
74240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.161
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0176
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00523
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000412
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0374
Alfa
AF:
0.00959
Hom.:
151
Bravo
AF:
0.0543
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.154
AC:
679
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.0174
AC:
2113
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0160
AC:
58
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000771

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 05, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Achromatopsia Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Dec 02, 2019- -
Severe early-childhood-onset retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Achromatopsia 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.078
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
Cadd
Benign
0.98
Dann
Benign
0.83
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.072
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.5
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0075
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.55
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0016
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.54
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.20
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.73
N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
0.25
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.63
T
Polyphen
0.0010
B
Vest4
0.040
MPC
0.029
ClinPred
0.0031
T
GERP RS
-6.8
Varity_R
0.037
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.19
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs16916632; hg19: chr8-87680282; API