rs16980398
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The ENST00000263388.7(NOTCH3):āc.5526T>Cā(p.Ala1842=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0267 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5,850 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.11 ( 3033 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.018 ( 2817 hom. )
Consequence
NOTCH3
ENST00000263388.7 synonymous
ENST00000263388.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.674
Genes affected
NOTCH3 (HGNC:7883): (notch receptor 3) This gene encodes the third discovered human homologue of the Drosophilia melanogaster type I membrane protein notch. In Drosophilia, notch interaction with its cell-bound ligands (delta, serrate) establishes an intercellular signalling pathway that plays a key role in neural development. Homologues of the notch-ligands have also been identified in human, but precise interactions between these ligands and the human notch homologues remains to be determined. Mutations in NOTCH3 have been identified as the underlying cause of cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 19-15165928-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-15165928-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 256144.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-15165928-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.674 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.375 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH3 | NM_000435.3 | c.5526T>C | p.Ala1842= | synonymous_variant | 30/33 | ENST00000263388.7 | NP_000426.2 | |
NOTCH3 | XM_005259924.5 | c.5370T>C | p.Ala1790= | synonymous_variant | 29/32 | XP_005259981.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH3 | ENST00000263388.7 | c.5526T>C | p.Ala1842= | synonymous_variant | 30/33 | 1 | NM_000435.3 | ENSP00000263388 | P1 | |
NOTCH3 | ENST00000597756.1 | c.42T>C | p.Ala14= | synonymous_variant | 1/3 | 2 | ENSP00000468879 | |||
NOTCH3 | ENST00000595514.1 | c.229-413T>C | intron_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 3 | ENSP00000470661 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.114 AC: 17321AN: 152036Hom.: 3018 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
17321
AN:
152036
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0352 AC: 8840AN: 251236Hom.: 1250 AF XY: 0.0288 AC XY: 3906AN XY: 135822
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8840
AN:
251236
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3906
AN XY:
135822
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0176 AC: 25702AN: 1461876Hom.: 2817 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0166 AC XY: 12067AN XY: 727242
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
25702
AN:
1461876
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
12067
AN XY:
727242
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.114 AC: 17368AN: 152154Hom.: 3033 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.110 AC XY: 8153AN XY: 74376
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
17368
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8153
AN XY:
74376
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
86
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 04, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 30, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Cerebral arteriopathy, autosomal dominant, with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy, type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at