rs17058153
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_138691.3(TMC1):c.1457T>C(p.Met486Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0226 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 623 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 33 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.023 ( 590 hom. )
Consequence
TMC1
NM_138691.3 missense
NM_138691.3 missense
Scores
1
2
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 4.64
Genes affected
TMC1 (HGNC:16513): (transmembrane channel like 1) This gene is considered a member of a gene family predicted to encode transmembrane proteins. The specific function of this gene is unknown; however, it is known to be required for normal function of cochlear hair cells. Mutations in this gene have been associated with progressive postlingual hearing loss and profound prelingual deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
PM1
?
In a topological_domain Cytoplasmic (size 172) in uniprot entity TMC1_HUMAN there are 14 pathogenic changes around while only 0 benign (100%) in NM_138691.3
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026560128).
BP6
?
Variant 9-72792243-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-72792243-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47860.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-72792243-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
?
GnomAdExome4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0606 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC1 | NM_138691.3 | c.1457T>C | p.Met486Thr | missense_variant | 17/24 | ENST00000297784.10 | |
TMC1 | XM_017014256.2 | c.1460T>C | p.Met487Thr | missense_variant | 14/21 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMC1 | ENST00000297784.10 | c.1457T>C | p.Met486Thr | missense_variant | 17/24 | 1 | NM_138691.3 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0177 AC: 2694AN: 152194Hom.: 32 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
2694
AN:
152194
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0236 AC: 5945AN: 251456Hom.: 124 AF XY: 0.0267 AC XY: 3629AN XY: 135894
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
5945
AN:
251456
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3629
AN XY:
135894
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0231 AC: 33829AN: 1461856Hom.: 590 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0247 AC XY: 17978AN XY: 727228
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
33829
AN:
1461856
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
17978
AN XY:
727228
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0177 AC: 2696AN: 152312Hom.: 33 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0176 AC XY: 1314AN XY: 74490
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
2696
AN:
152312
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
1314
AN XY:
74490
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
78
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
68
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
223
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
3023
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
73
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 13, 2009 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 20, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Dec 10, 2018 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 36 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N;.;N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;.;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;.;.;T;.
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;.;.;D;.
Polyphen
B;B;.;B;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at