rs17081389
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):āc.163C>Gā(p.Pro55Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00488 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 289 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018451.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | NM_018451.5 | c.163C>G | p.Pro55Ala | missense_variant | 2/17 | ENST00000381884.9 | NP_060921.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CENPJ | ENST00000381884.9 | c.163C>G | p.Pro55Ala | missense_variant | 2/17 | 1 | NM_018451.5 | ENSP00000371308 | P1 | |
CENPJ | ENST00000616936.4 | c.163C>G | p.Pro55Ala | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/16 | 1 | ENSP00000477511 | |||
CENPJ | ENST00000545981.6 | c.163C>G | p.Pro55Ala | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 2/18 | 2 | ENSP00000441090 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0242 AC: 3687AN: 152114Hom.: 135 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00680 AC: 1710AN: 251402Hom.: 68 AF XY: 0.00492 AC XY: 669AN XY: 135866
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00286 AC: 4178AN: 1461872Hom.: 154 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00243 AC XY: 1767AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0243 AC: 3696AN: 152232Hom.: 135 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0227 AC XY: 1689AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 28, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 26, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 29, 2018 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:1Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive;C3888212:Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 02, 2021 | - - |
Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at