rs17122769
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_005188.4(CBL):c.2710G>A(p.Val904Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000823 in 1,614,104 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005188.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | NM_005188.4 | c.2710G>A | p.Val904Ile | missense_variant | 16/16 | ENST00000264033.6 | NP_005179.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBL | ENST00000264033.6 | c.2710G>A | p.Val904Ile | missense_variant | 16/16 | 1 | NM_005188.4 | ENSP00000264033 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00423 AC: 643AN: 152174Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00119 AC: 300AN: 251306Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000861 AC XY: 117AN XY: 135826
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000470 AC: 687AN: 1461812Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000419 AC XY: 305AN XY: 727210
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00422 AC: 642AN: 152292Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00380 AC XY: 283AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 01, 2017 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 02, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | p.Val904Ile in Exon 16 of CBL: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.5% (57/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs17122769). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 03, 2020 | Variant summary: CBL c.2710G>A (p.Val904Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0015 in 282710 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.014 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5600 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CBL causing Noonan Syndrome and Related Conditions phenotype (2.5e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign (2x) and benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 21, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jul 19, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2024 | CBL: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
CBL-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 31, 2019 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
RASopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 12, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at