rs17221819

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_001378969.1(KCND3):​c.264C>T​(p.Pro88Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.106 in 1,612,354 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10,185 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.082 ( 618 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.11 ( 9567 hom. )

Consequence

KCND3
NM_001378969.1 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.11
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCND3 (HGNC:6239): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily D member 3) Voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels represent the most complex class of voltage-gated ion channels from both functional and structural standpoints. Their diverse functions include regulating neurotransmitter release, heart rate, insulin secretion, neuronal excitability, epithelial electrolyte transport, smooth muscle contraction, and cell volume. Four sequence-related potassium channel genes - shaker, shaw, shab, and shal - have been identified in Drosophila, and each has been shown to have human homolog(s). This gene encodes a member of the potassium channel, voltage-gated, shal-related subfamily, members of which form voltage-activated A-type potassium ion channels and are prominent in the repolarization phase of the action potential. This member includes two isoforms with different sizes, which are encoded by alternatively spliced transcript variants of this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 1-111982463-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-111982463-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 129314.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-111982463-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.11 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.118 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
KCND3NM_001378969.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.264C>T p.Pro88Pro synonymous_variant 2/8 ENST00000302127.5 NP_001365898.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCND3ENST00000302127.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.264C>T p.Pro88Pro synonymous_variant 2/85 NM_001378969.1 ENSP00000306923.4 Q9UK17-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0823
AC:
12522
AN:
152126
Hom.:
618
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0460
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0921
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0630
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0734
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0561
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0886
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.120
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0727
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0842
AC:
21137
AN:
251016
Hom.:
1177
AF XY:
0.0866
AC XY:
11746
AN XY:
135642
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0463
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0415
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0738
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000870
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0650
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0660
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.126
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0871
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.109
AC:
159107
AN:
1460110
Hom.:
9567
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.108
AC XY:
78351
AN XY:
725930
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0423
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0442
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0762
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000883
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0645
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0698
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.125
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0946
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0822
AC:
12522
AN:
152244
Hom.:
618
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0792
AC XY:
5891
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0459
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0629
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0734
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0557
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0646
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.120
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0724
Alfa
AF:
0.106
Hom.:
544
Bravo
AF:
0.0813
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0260
AC:
91
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.115
EpiControl
AF:
0.123

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 05, 2023- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMar 23, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 28, 2016This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 18, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 19/22 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.85

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17221819; hg19: chr1-112525085; COSMIC: COSV56190733; API