rs17235409
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_000578.4(SLC11A1):c.1627G>A(p.Asp543Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0284 in 1,609,430 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,304 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as risk factor (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000578.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC11A1 | NM_000578.4 | c.1627G>A | p.Asp543Asn | missense_variant | 15/15 | ENST00000233202.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC11A1 | ENST00000233202.11 | c.1627G>A | p.Asp543Asn | missense_variant | 15/15 | 1 | NM_000578.4 | P1 | |
SLC11A1 | ENST00000468221.5 | n.4754G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 13/13 | 1 | ||||
SLC11A1 | ENST00000354352.9 | c.*1209G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 16/16 | 1 | ||||
SLC11A1 | ENST00000465984.5 | n.2103G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 13/14 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0412 AC: 6263AN: 152186Hom.: 197 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0491 AC: 11852AN: 241194Hom.: 554 AF XY: 0.0454 AC XY: 5936AN XY: 130718
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0271 AC: 39430AN: 1457126Hom.: 1109 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0273 AC XY: 19758AN XY: 724476
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0411 AC: 6266AN: 152304Hom.: 195 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0428 AC XY: 3185AN XY: 74470
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Buruli ulcer, susceptibility to Other:1
risk factor, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | Apr 01, 2006 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at