rs1726790
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_002691.4(POLD1):c.1860G>A(p.Thr620Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00608 in 1,613,480 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 524 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.033 ( 277 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0033 ( 247 hom. )
Consequence
POLD1
NM_002691.4 synonymous
NM_002691.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -3.17
Genes affected
POLD1 (HGNC:9175): (DNA polymerase delta 1, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the 125-kDa catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta. DNA polymerase delta possesses both polymerase and 3' to 5' exonuclease activity and plays a critical role in DNA replication and repair. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been observed for this gene, and a pseudogene of this gene is located on the long arm of chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.74).
BP6
Variant 19-50408869-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-50408869-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380638.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-50408869-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.17 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.111 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | NM_002691.4 | c.1860G>A | p.Thr620Thr | synonymous_variant | 15/27 | ENST00000440232.7 | NP_002682.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLD1 | ENST00000440232.7 | c.1860G>A | p.Thr620Thr | synonymous_variant | 15/27 | 1 | NM_002691.4 | ENSP00000406046.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0329 AC: 5010AN: 152136Hom.: 275 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5010
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00878 AC: 2198AN: 250274Hom.: 115 AF XY: 0.00617 AC XY: 834AN XY: 135228
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
2198
AN:
250274
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
834
AN XY:
135228
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00327 AC: 4777AN: 1461226Hom.: 247 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00277 AC XY: 2015AN XY: 726944
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4777
AN:
1461226
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
2015
AN XY:
726944
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0330 AC: 5026AN: 152254Hom.: 277 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0319 AC XY: 2373AN XY: 74454
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5026
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2373
AN XY:
74454
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
24
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 06, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Aug 04, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 13, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 19, 2016 | Variant summary: The c.1860G>A (p.Thr620=) in PolD1 gene is a synonymous change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 5/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect normal splicing, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 1%, predominantly in individuals of African descent (~11%), including numerous homozygous occurrences. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individualsor cited by reputable databases/clinical laboratories. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 10 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Oct 25, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 20, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Carcinoma of colon Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The POLD1 p.Thr620= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs1726790) “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (classified benign by GeneDx, Invitae, Ambry Genetics and Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano), and in control databases in 3057 (172 homozygous) of 275952 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.01 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). Breakdown of the observations by population include African in 2743 (170 homozygous) of 24006 chromosomes (freq: 0.1), Other in 27 of 6436 chromosomes (freq: 0.004), Latino in 252 (2 homozygous) of 34266 chromosomes (freq: 0.007), European Non-Finnish in 32 of 125908 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10078 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30692 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while not observed in the East Asian and European Finnish populations. The p.Thr620= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at