rs17336639
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_005228.5(EGFR):c.797C>A(p.Pro266Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000013 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P266S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005228.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- lung cancerInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics
- non-small cell lung carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- inflammatory skin and bowel disease, neonatal, 2Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P
- neonatal inflammatory skin and bowel diseaseInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGFR | NM_005228.5 | c.797C>A | p.Pro266Gln | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 28 | ENST00000275493.7 | NP_005219.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EGFR | ENST00000275493.7 | c.797C>A | p.Pro266Gln | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 28 | 1 | NM_005228.5 | ENSP00000275493.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000795 AC: 2AN: 251466 AF XY: 0.0000147 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000130 AC: 19AN: 1461894Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000179 AC XY: 13AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74370 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
EGFR-related lung cancer Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with glutamine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 266 of the EGFR protein (p.Pro266Gln). This variant is present in population databases (rs17336639, gnomAD 0.007%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of EGFR-related conditions (PMID: 35264596). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 584688). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt EGFR protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
The p.P266Q variant (also known as c.797C>A), located in coding exon 7 of the EGFR gene, results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 797. The proline at codon 266 is replaced by glutamine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, the clinical significance of this variant remains unclear.
Hereditary cancer Uncertain:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at