rs17353856
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP7BA1
The NM_001193424.2(SUV39H2):c.966C>T(p.Tyr322Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.125 in 1,613,652 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,659 homozygotes. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.095 ( 882 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.13 ( 12777 hom. )
Consequence
SUV39H2
NM_001193424.2 synonymous
NM_001193424.2 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.128
Publications
26 publications found
Genes affected
SUV39H2 (HGNC:17287): (SUV39H2 histone lysine methyltransferase) Enables S-adenosyl-L-methionine binding activity; histone methyltransferase activity (H3-K9 specific); and zinc ion binding activity. Involved in chromatin assembly or disassembly and chromatin remodeling. Acts upstream of or within cellular response to hypoxia and negative regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Located in chromatin. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
DCLRE1C (HGNC:17642): (DNA cross-link repair 1C) This gene encodes a nuclear protein that is involved in V(D)J recombination and DNA repair. The encoded protein has single-strand-specific 5'-3' exonuclease activity; it also exhibits endonuclease activity on 5' and 3' overhangs and hairpins. The protein also functions in the regulation of the cell cycle in response to DNA damage. Mutations in this gene can cause Athabascan-type severe combined immunodeficiency (SCIDA) and Omenn syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]
DCLRE1C Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- Omenn syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- severe combined immunodeficiency due to DCLRE1C deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.128 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.133 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUV39H2 | NM_001193424.2 | c.966C>T | p.Tyr322Tyr | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 6 | ENST00000354919.11 | NP_001180353.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUV39H2 | ENST00000354919.11 | c.966C>T | p.Tyr322Tyr | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 6 | 5 | NM_001193424.2 | ENSP00000346997.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0954 AC: 14515AN: 152096Hom.: 882 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
14515
AN:
152096
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.105 AC: 26228AN: 250970 AF XY: 0.105 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
26228
AN:
250970
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.128 AC: 186402AN: 1461438Hom.: 12777 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.126 AC XY: 91663AN XY: 727000 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
186402
AN:
1461438
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
91663
AN XY:
727000
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
918
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
5083
AN:
44656
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1759
AN:
26124
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
89
AN:
39690
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
7599
AN:
86160
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
6666
AN:
53400
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
642
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
156696
AN:
1111798
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
6950
AN:
60376
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.470
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8139
16278
24418
32557
40696
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5570
11140
16710
22280
27850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0953 AC: 14512AN: 152214Hom.: 882 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0957 AC XY: 7124AN XY: 74406 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
14512
AN:
152214
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7124
AN XY:
74406
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
1288
AN:
41534
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1604
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
245
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
390
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
1447
AN:
10572
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
9202
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
203
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
665
1330
1994
2659
3324
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
170
340
510
680
850
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
149
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.