rs17411795
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_001142800.2(EYS):c.1922A>T(p.Glu641Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.196 in 1,551,002 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31,981 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2384 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.20 ( 29597 hom. )
Consequence
EYS
NM_001142800.2 missense
NM_001142800.2 missense
Scores
3
3
12
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.425
Genes affected
EYS (HGNC:21555): (eyes shut homolog) The product of this gene contains multiple epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like and LamG domains. The protein is expressed in the photoreceptor layer of the retina, and the gene is mutated in autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004574895).
BP6
Variant 6-65295964-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-65295964-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 137268.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-65295964-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.214 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYS | NM_001142800.2 | c.1922A>T | p.Glu641Val | missense_variant | 12/43 | ENST00000503581.6 | NP_001136272.1 | |
EYS | NM_001292009.2 | c.1922A>T | p.Glu641Val | missense_variant | 12/44 | NP_001278938.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EYS | ENST00000503581.6 | c.1922A>T | p.Glu641Val | missense_variant | 12/43 | 5 | NM_001142800.2 | ENSP00000424243.1 | ||
EYS | ENST00000370621.7 | c.1922A>T | p.Glu641Val | missense_variant | 12/44 | 1 | ENSP00000359655.3 | |||
EYS | ENST00000370615.3 | n.360A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/2 | 3 | |||||
EYS | ENST00000447127.1 | n.378A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.162 AC: 24611AN: 151796Hom.: 2385 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
24611
AN:
151796
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.168 AC: 26497AN: 157354Hom.: 2688 AF XY: 0.165 AC XY: 13735AN XY: 83048
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
26497
AN:
157354
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
13735
AN XY:
83048
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.200 AC: 279555AN: 1399088Hom.: 29597 Cov.: 45 AF XY: 0.197 AC XY: 135724AN XY: 690048
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
279555
AN:
1399088
Hom.:
Cov.:
45
AF XY:
AC XY:
135724
AN XY:
690048
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.162 AC: 24611AN: 151914Hom.: 2384 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.161 AC XY: 11970AN XY: 74268
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
24611
AN:
151914
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
11970
AN XY:
74268
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
806
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
829
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
114
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
666
ExAC
AF:
AC:
3841
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
262
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 03, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 05, 2011 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Retinitis pigmentosa Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Retinitis pigmentosa 25 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 01, 2021 | - - |
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University | Oct 01, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
M;M
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D;D
Polyphen
D;.
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at