rs174544
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_013402.7(FADS1):c.*2130G>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.26 in 151,650 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,802 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.26 ( 6795 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.28 ( 7 hom. )
Consequence
FADS1
NM_013402.7 3_prime_UTR
NM_013402.7 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.228
Publications
66 publications found
Genes affected
FADS1 (HGNC:3574): (fatty acid desaturase 1) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fatty acid desaturase (FADS) gene family. Desaturase enzymes regulate unsaturation of fatty acids through the introduction of double bonds between defined carbons of the fatty acyl chain. FADS family members are considered fusion products composed of an N-terminal cytochrome b5-like domain and a C-terminal multiple membrane-spanning desaturase portion, both of which are characterized by conserved histidine motifs. This gene is clustered with family members FADS1 and FADS2 at 11q12-q13.1; this cluster is thought to have arisen evolutionarily from gene duplication based on its similar exon/intron organization. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
FADS2 (HGNC:3575): (fatty acid desaturase 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the fatty acid desaturase (FADS) gene family. Desaturase enzymes regulate unsaturation of fatty acids through the introduction of double bonds between defined carbons of the fatty acyl chain. FADS family members are considered fusion products composed of an N-terminal cytochrome b5-like domain and a C-terminal multiple membrane-spanning desaturase portion, both of which are characterized by conserved histidine motifs. This gene is clustered with family members at 11q12-q13.1; this cluster is thought to have arisen evolutionarily from gene duplication based on its similar exon/intron organization. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.522 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FADS1 | NM_013402.7 | c.*2130G>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | ENST00000350997.12 | NP_037534.5 | ||
| FADS1 | XM_011545022.3 | c.*2130G>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | XP_011543324.1 | |||
| FADS1 | XM_047426935.1 | c.*2130G>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | XP_047282891.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FADS1 | ENST00000350997.12 | c.*2130G>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 12 of 12 | 1 | NM_013402.7 | ENSP00000322229.9 | |||
| FADS2 | ENST00000574708.5 | n.49+7253C>A | intron_variant | Intron 1 of 2 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.260 AC: 39360AN: 151352Hom.: 6775 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
39360
AN:
151352
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.278 AC: 50AN: 180Hom.: 7 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.313 AC XY: 35AN XY: 112 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
50
AN:
180
Hom.:
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
AC XY:
35
AN XY:
112
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2
American (AMR)
AC:
0
AN:
0
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
36
AN:
138
South Asian (SAS)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Finnish (FIN)
AC:
0
AN:
0
Middle Eastern (MID)
AC:
0
AN:
0
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
34
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
4
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.260 AC: 39394AN: 151470Hom.: 6795 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.267 AC XY: 19747AN XY: 73990 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
39394
AN:
151470
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
19747
AN XY:
73990
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
2932
AN:
41322
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
7016
AN:
15210
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
760
AN:
3462
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
2764
AN:
5126
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
784
AN:
4798
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
4120
AN:
10422
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
95
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
20092
AN:
67818
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
641
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1262
2525
3787
5050
6312
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
390
780
1170
1560
1950
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1235
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.