rs17624033

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_032119.4(ADGRV1):​c.10872A>G​(p.Gln3624Gln) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.041 in 1,612,324 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,614 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.032 ( 125 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.042 ( 1489 hom. )

Consequence

ADGRV1
NM_032119.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.128

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ADGRV1 (HGNC:17416): (adhesion G protein-coupled receptor V1) This gene encodes a member of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily. The encoded protein contains a 7-transmembrane receptor domain, binds calcium and is expressed in the central nervous system. Mutations in this gene are associated with Usher syndrome 2 and familial febrile seizures. Several alternatively spliced transcripts have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
ADGRV1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2C
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • febrile seizures, familial, 4
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • nonsyndromic genetic hearing loss
    Inheritance: AR Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -19 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (REVEL=0.066).
BP6
Variant 5-90745693-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-90745693-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 46252.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.128 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0318 (4840/152296) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.0466 (713/15294). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0438. There are 125 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2280 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 125 AR,AD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ADGRV1NM_032119.4 linkc.10872A>G p.Gln3624Gln synonymous_variant Exon 52 of 90 ENST00000405460.9 NP_115495.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ADGRV1ENST00000405460.9 linkc.10872A>G p.Gln3624Gln synonymous_variant Exon 52 of 90 1 NM_032119.4 ENSP00000384582.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0318
AC:
4842
AN:
152178
Hom.:
125
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00881
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0910
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0467
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0713
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0145
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0187
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0538
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0447
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0502
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0312
AC:
7750
AN:
248594
AF XY:
0.0317
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00698
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0272
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0623
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0434
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0382
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0420
AC:
61301
AN:
1460028
Hom.:
1489
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0413
AC XY:
30017
AN XY:
726416
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00783
AC:
262
AN:
33456
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0288
AC:
1287
AN:
44714
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0629
AC:
1644
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000757
AC:
3
AN:
39644
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0177
AC:
1522
AN:
86230
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0217
AC:
1154
AN:
53164
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0472
AC:
271
AN:
5744
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0474
AC:
52673
AN:
1110634
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0412
AC:
2485
AN:
60320
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2838
5675
8513
11350
14188
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1978
3956
5934
7912
9890
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0318
AC:
4840
AN:
152296
Hom.:
125
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0306
AC XY:
2280
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00878
AC:
365
AN:
41572
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0466
AC:
713
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0713
AC:
247
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000193
AC:
1
AN:
5194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0145
AC:
70
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0187
AC:
199
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0544
AC:
16
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0447
AC:
3041
AN:
68014
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0497
AC:
105
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
236
472
709
945
1181
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
52
104
156
208
260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0428
Hom.:
500
Bravo
AF:
0.0344
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00895
AC:
32
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0477
EpiControl
AF:
0.0463

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Mar 20, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 14, 2011
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 11, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1Other:1
-
NEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 2C Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
4.3
DANN
Benign
0.30
PhyloP100
0.13
PromoterAI
-0.0022
Neutral
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17624033; hg19: chr5-90041510; API