rs17667728
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_138694.4(PKHD1):c.11340T>C(p.Pro3780=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0393 in 1,604,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,405 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 123 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.040 ( 1282 hom. )
Consequence
PKHD1
NM_138694.4 synonymous
NM_138694.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.577
Genes affected
PKHD1 (HGNC:9016): (PKHD1 ciliary IPT domain containing fibrocystin/polyductin) The protein encoded by this gene is predicted to have a single transmembrane (TM)-spanning domain and multiple copies of an immunoglobulin-like plexin-transcription-factor domain. Alternative splicing results in two transcript variants encoding different isoforms. Other alternatively spliced transcripts have been described, but the full length sequences have not been determined. Several of these transcripts are predicted to encode truncated products which lack the TM and may be secreted. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, also known as polycystic kidney and hepatic disease-1. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).
BP6
Variant 6-51648089-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-51648089-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 262384.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-51648089-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.577 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0365 (5552/152262) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0432 (1793/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0415. There are 123 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 2573 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 123 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | NM_138694.4 | c.11340T>C | p.Pro3780= | synonymous_variant | 63/67 | ENST00000371117.8 | NP_619639.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKHD1 | ENST00000371117.8 | c.11340T>C | p.Pro3780= | synonymous_variant | 63/67 | 1 | NM_138694.4 | ENSP00000360158 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0365 AC: 5546AN: 152144Hom.: 120 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5546
AN:
152144
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0328 AC: 8236AN: 251050Hom.: 174 AF XY: 0.0330 AC XY: 4481AN XY: 135656
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8236
AN:
251050
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4481
AN XY:
135656
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0396 AC: 57460AN: 1452672Hom.: 1282 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.0392 AC XY: 28369AN XY: 723266
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
57460
AN:
1452672
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
28369
AN XY:
723266
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0365 AC: 5552AN: 152262Hom.: 123 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0346 AC XY: 2573AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5552
AN:
152262
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2573
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
46
AN:
3476
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | Oct 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 11, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The PKHD1 p.Pro3780= variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs17667728) as “With Benign allele”, ClinVar (as benign by Prevention Genetics and Invitae), Clinvitae (3x as benign), RWTH AAachen University ARPKD database (as a polymorphism). The variant was not identified in the LOVD 3.0 database. The variant was also identified in control databases in 9157 of 276782 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.033084 in the following populations at a frequency greater than 1%: African in 1053 (29 homozygous) of 24034 chromosomes (freq. 0.044), Other in 222 (1 homozygous) of 6454 chromosomes (freq. 0.034), Latino in 1111 (24 homozygous) of 34410 chromosomes (freq. 0.032), European (Non-Finnish) in 5290 (109 homozygous) of 126334 chromosomes (freq. 0.042), Ashkenazi Jewish in 400 (8 homozygous) of 10134 chromosomes (freq. 0.039), European (Finnish) in 361 (5 homozygous) of 25782 chromosomes (freq. 0.014), and South Asian in 713 (20 homozygous) of 30778 chromosomes (freq. 0.023) as well as at frequencies below 1% in East Asian populations in 7 of 18856 chromosomes (freq. 0.0004) increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant is widely reported in the literature as a polymorphism, with an allele frequency between 3 and 5% (Bergmann 2004, Bergmann 2005, Furu 2003, Losekoot 2005, Obeidova 2015, Rosetti 2003, Sharp 2005). The p.Pro3780= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at