rs17722227
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_024577.4(SH3TC2):c.1350G>A(p.Pro450Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0186 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,295 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.026 ( 296 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 1999 hom. )
Consequence
SH3TC2
NM_024577.4 synonymous
NM_024577.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.20
Genes affected
SH3TC2 (HGNC:29427): (SH3 domain and tetratricopeptide repeats 2) This gene encodes a protein with two N-terminal Src homology 3 (SH3) domains and 10 tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motifs, and is a member of a small gene family. The gene product has been proposed to be an adapter or docking molecule. Mutations in this gene result in autosomal recessive Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C, a childhood-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by demyelination of motor and sensory neurons. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 5-149028382-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149028382-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 139101.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-149028382-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.2 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.146 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH3TC2 | NM_024577.4 | c.1350G>A | p.Pro450Pro | synonymous_variant | 11/17 | ENST00000515425.6 | NP_078853.2 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0258 AC: 3921AN: 152180Hom.: 293 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3921
AN:
152180
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0550 AC: 13794AN: 251022Hom.: 1583 AF XY: 0.0471 AC XY: 6396AN XY: 135754
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
13794
AN:
251022
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
6396
AN XY:
135754
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0178 AC: 26032AN: 1461824Hom.: 1999 Cov.: 78 AF XY: 0.0177 AC XY: 12858AN XY: 727224
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
26032
AN:
1461824
Hom.:
Cov.:
78
AF XY:
AC XY:
12858
AN XY:
727224
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0258 AC: 3932AN: 152298Hom.: 296 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0296 AC XY: 2205AN XY: 74468
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3932
AN:
152298
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2205
AN XY:
74468
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
335
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 20, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 05, 2015 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Susceptibility to mononeuropathy of the median nerve, mild Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at